JOE: So, TULIP
How much of that you cool with?
I just met a group of "Lutheran" double-predestinators/limited atoners and it was a little weir.d
(The orthodox Lutheran position is generally single predestination, which I realize is a contradiction to human minds, but, "the wisdom of God is foolishness to men" and all that.)
You left the chat by logging out or being disconnected.
ME: you are c=razy
and i'm in class, so we will have to discuss later
JOE: crazy??
You mean... theologically?
ME: no, more of on a personal level
JOE: or in that this is what I've chosen to discuss on my lunch break?
ah, well.
correct
It's good to be loved.
ME: ha
you're welcome
JOE:I've also lately become fond of referring to things as "the error of Rome" if I find them too Papist and "the error of Geneva" if I find them too Calvinist.
It's sweet.
I suppose I could also say "the error of Constantinople" if I find things too... iconoclastic?
But frankly, how often does THAT come up??
ME: this is going on my blog, fyi
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
you're both funny. Did I mention that your blog is pink?
ReplyDeletei'm glad i'm not the only one who gets this treatment
ReplyDeleteJoe: I just met a group of "Lutheran" double-predestinators/limited atoners and it was a little weird.
ReplyDeleteMe: yeah did they say anything too iconoclastic?
Joe: Hmm
Joe: Have you been talking to Libby?
I think I'll start using "the error of the Ville" to refer to anything too Kathy-like.
ReplyDeleteHow am I JUST NOW reading these comments? ha
ReplyDelete